Schleifen und Arrays(Java)

[the]

Ineluke:

Code:

for (int I=0; I<=6; I++)
 {
   for (int J=0; J<=I; J++)
    { printf("%d",J+1); }
   printf(" ");
   for (int K=0; K<=6-I; K++)
    { printf("%c",A[K]); }
   printf("\n");
 }

...

the:

Code:

var
  i, j: Integer;
begin
  for j := 1 to 7 do
  begin
    for i := 1 to j do
      Write(i);
    Write(' ');
    for i := 0 to 7-j do
      Write(Chr(Ord('a')+i));
    Writeln;
  end;
end.

...

Where are the differences? Do you see them? Uhm, yes, right:

• Ineluke has not even a snippet, while the other is a complete pascal program.
• Ineluke has used zero-based indexing - valid and often used in c++ programs, but not useful for newbies.
• Ineluke took 3 variables, where I used the second one again. That comes through pascal, where you have to declare the variables before the execution body - but even then Ineluke feigns three hierarchies, where are only two.
• Ineluke uses an array for letters, which IS good for compatibility... but nothing else.

Beside these facts it is the SAME ALGORITHM... which rises the question: Does Ineluke ignore my post? Can he not carefully read posts? Doesn't he understand my code? Or does he simply had the feeling, July had not even yet understand the solutions?

Anyway, the explanation of Ineluke was very fine, but he should not use the fixed-width font (which is used for coding examples) for a statement. So it is now up to July to decide, IF this is/was enough input for her.

br, the.

p.s. Ups, sorry... bin grad auf Arbeit - den ganzen Tag Englisch reden, schreiben, telefonieren, coden und dokumentieren... da kann man schon mal vergessen, wo man herkommt

[EDIT]
Während man noch schreibt, sind die anderen bereits eine Seite weiter ^^. Wie auch immer, die "offizielle" Lösung würde mich auch interessieren.
[/EDIT]