Lesenswertes Interview mit Christopher Nolan über seine Philosophie und Arbeitsweise beim Filmemachen uvm. Besonders hervorheben möchte ich diese Aussage hier:
Zitat Zitat von Nolan
The thing with computer-generated imagery is that it’s an incredibly powerful tool for making better visual effects. But I believe in an absolute difference between animation and photography. However sophisticated your computer-generated imagery is, if it’s been created from no physical elements and you haven’t shot anything, it’s going to feel like animation. There are usually two different goals in a visual effects movie. One is to fool the audience into seeing something seamless, and that’s how I try to use it. The other is to impress the audience with the amount of money spent on the spectacle of the visual effect, and that, I have no interest in. We try to enhance our stunt work and floor effects with extraordinary CGI tools like wire and rig removals. If you put a lot of time and effort into matching your original film elements, the kind of enhancements you can put into the frames can really trick the eye, offering results far beyond what was possible 20 years ago. The problem for me is if you don’t first shoot something with the camera on which to base the shot, the visual effect is going to stick out if the film you’re making has a realistic style or patina. I prefer films that feel more like real life, so any CGI has to be very carefully handled to fit into that.
Ganz seiner Meinung
Zitat Zitat von Andrei Beitrag anzeigen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCNKahG1ksg&hd=1
War mir nicht sicher, ob ich mir den Film vormerken sollte, alleine schon weil ich Zeitreisen-Geschichten normalerweise nicht leiden kann. Aber das hier könnte nicht übel werden, sieht besser aus als erwartet. Und Emily Blunt stehen blonde Haare.