Ich steh auf Frauen. !11
Druckbare Version
Ich steh auf Frauen. !11
Catchphrase
Weiterposten, wir müssen die 2000er Marke knacken heute!
WTF
no scrin
:p
boom
Auch auf echte!
:A
<--- Liebt RPG's.
no jkjkjkjkjk lolololol.
http://www.multimediaxis.de/images/s.../old/sm_12.gifZitat:
Zitat von Byder
Ich bin dafür die Sperre wieder einzuführen!
:rolleyes:>:(:o:rolleyes:Zitat:
Zitat von Seiken
Zillow allows users to see the value of millions of homes across the United States, not just those up for sale. In addition to giving value estimates of homes, it offers several unique features including value changes of each home in a given time frame (such as 1, 5, or 10 years), aerial views of homes, and prices of homes in the area. Where it can access appropriate data, it also provides basic information on a given home, such as square footage and the number of bedrooms and bathrooms. Users can also get current estimates of homes if there was a significant change made, such as a recently remodeled kitchen. Zillow provides an application programming interface (API) and developer support network.[2][3][4]
In December 2006, Zillow launched three new pieces of functionality: the ability to post homes for sale, the ability to set a "Make Me Move" price (an informal way to pre-market a home), and a real estate wiki. In 2007, Zillow teamed with Microsoft to offer Bird's Eye View, a feature in Microsoft Virtual Earth, that shows (in certain areas) clearer aerial photographs taken from airplanes rather than conventional satellite imagery. Zillow uses this functionality for entertainment-focused features on famous homes.[5]
69!
Aber doch nicht UNS gegenüber :oZitat:
Zitat von Alphashark
:\
SteelTalons vs...
<--- Findet, das hier alles viel zu schnell geht.
Leute ich bin alt.
kannst mal sehen :AZitat:
Zitat von devilX
:AZitat:
Zitat von Gendrek
Jaja
Doppel …Zitat:
Zitat von mq
… post.Zitat:
Zitat von mq
:)
The problem of universals is an ancient problem in metaphysics about whether universals exist. Universals are general or abstract qualities, characteristics, properties, kinds or relations, such as being male/female, solid/liquid/gas or a certain colour[1], that can be predicated of individuals or particulars or that individuals or particulars can be regarded as sharing or participating in. For example, Meena, John and Poppy all have the quality of being human or humanity is the universal they have in common. While many standard cases of universals are also typically regarded as abstract objects (such as humanity), abstract objects are not necessarily universals. For example, in an article on nominalism by Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra, numbers can be held to be particular yet abstract objects.[2]
The problem of universals is about their status; as to whether universals exist independently of the individuals of whom they can be predicated or if they are merely convenient ways of talking about and finding similarity among particular things that are radically different. This has led philosophers to raise questions like, if they exist, do they exist in the individuals or only in people's minds or in some separate metaphysical domain? Questions like these arise from attempts to account for the phenomenon of similarity or attribute agreement among things.[3] For example, living grass and some apples are similar, namely in having the attribute of greenness. The issue, however, is how to account for this and related facts.
Contents
[hide]
* 1 Positions
o 1.1 Realism
o 1.2 Nominalism
* 2 Ancient thought
o 2.1 Plato
o 2.2 Aristotle
* 3 Medieval thought
o 3.1 Medieval nominalism
* 4 Modern thought
o 4.1 Berkeley
o 4.2 Mill
o 4.3 Peirce
o 4.4 James
* 5 Contemporary realisms
* 6 See also
* 7 Notes
* 8 References and further reading
* 9 External links
[edit] Positions
There are two main positions on the issue: realism and nominalism (sometimes simply called "anti-realism" in regards to universals).[4]
[edit] Realism
The realist school claims that universals are real — they exist and are distinct from the particulars that instantiate them. There are various forms of realism. Two major forms are Platonic realism (universalia ante rem) and Aristotelian realism (universalia in rebus).[5] Platonic realism is the view that universals are real entities and they exist independent of particulars. Aristotelian realism, on the other hand, is the view that universals are real entities, but their existence is dependent on the particulars that exemplify them. Realism has been endorsed by many, including Plato, Aristotle, and Bertrand Russell (1912).
Realists tend to argue that universals must be posited as distinct entities in order to account for various phenomena. For example, a common realist argument, arguably found in Plato, is that universals are required for certain general words to have meaning and for the sentences in which they occur to be true or false. Take the sentence "Djivan Gasparyan is a musician". The realist may claim that this sentence is only meaningful and expresses a truth because there is an individual, Djivan Gasparyan, who possesses a certain quality, musicianship. Thus it is assumed that the property is a universal which is distinct from the particular individual who has the property (MacLeod & Rubenstein, 2006, §1b).
[edit] Nominalism
Nominalists assert that only individuals or particulars exist and deny that universals are real (i.e. that they exist as entities or beings). The term "nominalism" comes from the Latin nomen ("name"). There are various forms of nominalism (which is sometimes also referred to as "terminism"), three major forms are resemblance nominalism, conceptualism and trope nominalism. Nominalism has been endorsed or defended by many, including William of Ockham, D. C. Williams (1953), David Lewis (1983) and arguably H. H. Price (1953) and W. V. O. Quine (1961).
Nominalists often argue for their view by claiming that realism has insurmountable problems. Another sort of argument for their view is that nominalism can account for all the relevant phenomena, so — by Ockham's razor or some sort of principle of simplicity — nominalism is preferable, since it posits less entity.
[edit] Ancient thought
[edit] Plato
Plato, at least during the first part of his life, believed there to be a sharp distinction between the world of perceivable objects and the world of universals or forms: one can only have mere opinions about the former, but one can have knowledge about the latter. For Plato it was not possible to have knowledge of anything that could change or was particular, since knowledge had to be forever unfailing and general.[6]. For that reason, the world of the forms is the real world, like sunlight, the sensible world is only imperfectly or partially real, like shadows. Plato, accordingly, took a realist position regarding universals. This Platonic realism, however, in denying full reality to the material world, differs sharply with modern forms of realism, which generally assert the reality of the external, physical world and which in some versions deny the reality of ideals.
One of the first nominalist critiques of Plato's realism was that of Diogenes of Sinope, who said "I've seen Plato's cups and table, but not his cupness and tableness."[7]
[edit] Aristotle
Plato's student Aristotle disagreed with his tutor. Aristotle transformed Plato's forms into "formal causes", the blueprints or essences of individual things. Whereas Plato idealized geometry, Aristotle emphasized biology and related disciplines and therefore much of his thinking concerns living beings and their properties. The nature of universals in Aristotle's philosophy therefore hinges on his view of natural kinds.
Consider for example a particular oak tree. This is a member of a species and it has much in common with other oak trees, past, present and future. Its universal, its oakness, is a part of it. A biologist can study oak trees and learn about oakness and more generally the intelligible order within the sensible world. Accordingly, Aristotle was more confident than Plato about coming to know the sensible world; he was a prototypical empiricist and a founder of induction. Aristotle was a new, moderate sort of realist about universals.
:(
:o
Irgendwie lasst ihr nach, ich hab gerade zweimal reloadet, ohne dass 'ne neue Seite kam :O
who am i kidding i have a gun
>:(
Ferkel!Zitat:
Zitat von Sammy
Ja sicher doch. <3
Auf die 2000. und den damit verbundenen, nicht abschlagbaren Wunsch, den Ran in seiner übereifrigen Art zugestanden hat ^.^! Das wird noch was, also macht hinne hier!
Wer das alles hier nachliest, kriegt nen Orden :O
Nen imaginären.
Na wo hat er das wohl gelernt? XZitat:
Zitat von Alphashark
Der User, der hier den 2000. Post schreibt, der bekommt 50 Posts geschenkt!
Eierzwirbeln ist nicht gesund.
strike 1
*spam*
Hi wie gehts?
Your bedtime story is scaring everyone
by In Flames
Pind time and play with innocence
Like you never would
I don`t see you make any sence
I guess you deliver misery just like you should.
1 o`clock and you paint the skies grey
Ain`t you fault, WE`RE the ones who betray.
Just how can you say it with such ense?
You want to take a stand or just place?
Your bedtimestory is scarin everyone.
But you make me understand.
The Evil that men do.
Your bedtime story is scaring everyone
by In Flames
Pind time and play with innocence
Like you never would
I don`t see you make any sence
I guess you deliver misery just like you should.
1 o`clock and you paint the skies grey
Ain`t you fault, WE`RE the ones who betray.
Just how can you say it with such ense?
You want to take a stand or just place?
Your bedtimestory is scarin everyone.
But you make me understand.
The Evil that men do.
Your bedtime story is scaring everyone
by In Flames
Pind time and play with innocence
Like you never would
I don`t see you make any sence
I guess you deliver misery just like you should.
1 o`clock and you paint the skies grey
Ain`t you fault, WE`RE the ones who betray.
Just how can you say it with such ense?
You want to take a stand or just place?
Your bedtimestory is scarin everyone.
But you make me understand.
The Evil that men do.
Your bedtime story is scaring everyone
by In Flames
Pind time and play with innocence
Like you never would
I don`t see you make any sence
I guess you deliver misery just like you should.
1 o`clock and you paint the skies grey
Ain`t you fault, WE`RE the ones who betray.
Just how can you say it with such ense?
You want to take a stand or just place?
Your bedtimestory is scarin everyone.
But you make me understand.
The Evil that men do.
Your bedtime story is scaring everyone
by In Flames
Pind time and play with innocence
Like you never would
I don`t see you make any sence
I guess you deliver misery just like you should.
1 o`clock and you paint the skies grey
Ain`t you fault, WE`RE the ones who betray.
Just how can you say it with such ense?
You want to take a stand or just place?
Your bedtimestory is scarin everyone.
But you make me understand.
The Evil that men do.
und wieder einen Schritt näher an die 2000 ^^
no not you you have no ticket
*hinne mach*Zitat:
Zitat von darkblue
wenn ich diesen Post abschicke sind wir über 760
freaks
Nicht verlockend genug!Zitat:
Zitat von Mog
ich seh ROT
:(:(
Super psots ftew.!1
Für das hinne machen!
:confused:
oh the man who cant open the door
Bedank Dich bei gewissen Leuten im Staff. T.TZitat:
Zitat von Virginie
lol
Am besten suchst du hier im Thread nach einen Bürgen und fragst alle einzeln durch ... schließlich brauchen wir noch Beiträge. :OZitat:
Zitat von devilX
Wie viele Posts werde ich wohl verpassen, wenn ich es jetzt wage, mir ein Brot zu schmieren?
9 Postings noch für mich, YEAH!
I Think We Are Both Suffering From The Same Crushing Metaphysical Crisis!
*mitspam*Zitat:
Zitat von mq
Kranker Shice.
Haha/nelson :PZitat:
Zitat von Virginie
i hate those catwalks
:D
Ich seh tote Zombies !1Zitat:
Zitat von devilX
;)
Zuviele...Zitat:
Zitat von Virginie
Wählt den Oberspammer!
:p
8)
Die Frage hab ich mir eben auch gestellt. :DZitat:
Zitat von Virginie
Kann ich auch auf einen User wetten? ^^Zitat:
Zitat von Mog
Namen! Ich brauche Namen *Schläger auspack*Zitat:
Zitat von Alphashark
Ihr seid krank... Schon über 700!!! .-.
Ich will zocken, aber auch spammen...
D
I
E
S
E
R
T
H
R
E
A
D
I
S
T
z
u
M
E
R
K
W
Ü
R
D
I
G
???
the other hand you idiot